Lewis v. Lum et al
Filing
16
ORDER Adopting 12 Report and Recommendations. Lewis' claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" within the meaning of 28 U.S. C. §1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from the order adopting this recommendation or the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/29/2017. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JERMAIN D. LEWIS
V.
PLAINTIFF
NO: 5:17CV00175 JLH/PSH
KIMBERLY LUM, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, and the objections filed. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court
concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
1.
Lewis’ claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted.
2.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(g).
3.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from the order adopting this recommendation or the accompanying judgment would not be
taken in good faith.
DATED this 29th day of September, 2017.
__________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?