Harris v. Adams et al

Filing 12

ORDER adopting in its entirety 8 the recommended disposition; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff Harris's petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; counting dismissal of this action as a "strike;" and certifying that an in forma pauperis from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/26/2017. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MARCUS D. HARRIS
ADC #553083
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 5:17-CV-00185 BSM

ADAMS, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 8] submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge Patricia S. Harris has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After a careful
review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly,
plaintiff Harris’s petition is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3), it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from
this order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of October 2017.

_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE