Harris v. Adams et al
ORDER adopting in its entirety 8 the recommended disposition; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff Harris's petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; counting dismissal of this action as a "strike;" and certifying that an in forma pauperis from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/26/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MARCUS D. HARRIS
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-00185 BSM
ADAMS, et al.
The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 8] submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge Patricia S. Harris has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After a careful
review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly,
plaintiff Harris’s petition is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3), it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from
this order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of October 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?