Neal v. Kelly et al

Filing 12

ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 6 Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing, without prejudice, Neal's retaliation claims; and denying his request for 5 injunctive relief. Neal may proceed with his access-to-the-courts claim against Defendant Kelly and his corrective-inaction claims against Defendants Branch, Wendy Kelly, and Andrews. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/12/2017. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION RICKEY L. NEAL, ADC #070303 V. PLAINTIFF NO. 5:17CV00211 JLH/BD KELLY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received a Partial Recommended Disposition (ARecommendation@) filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. The parties have not filed objections. After careful review of the Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects in its entirety. Neal’s retaliation claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice, and his request for injunctive relief (Document #5) is DENIED. Neal may proceed with his access-to-the-courts claim against Defendant Kelly and his corrective-inaction claims against Defendants Branch, Wendy Kelly, and Andrews. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2017. _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?