Jefferson v. Arkansas, State of
Filing
5
ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 3 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 1 Jefferson's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; dismissing, without prejudice, the 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus so that Jefferson may seek authorization from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to file a successive habeas petition; and denying a Certificate of Appealability pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/21/2017. (ljb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
WESLEY JEFFERSON
V.
PETITIONER
NO. 5:17CV00263-JM-JTR
STATE OF ARKANSAS
RESPONDENT
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these
documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this
Court=s findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
Jefferson’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Doc. 1, is
GRANTED;
2.
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254, Doc. 2, is
DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, so that Jefferson may seek authorization from the
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2244(b)(3)(A), to file a successive
habeas petition; and
3.
A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules
Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts.
DATED this 21st day of November, 2017.
____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?