Jefferson v. Arkansas, State of

Filing 5

ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 3 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 1 Jefferson's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; dismissing, without prejudice, the 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus so that Jefferson may seek authorization from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to file a successive habeas petition; and denying a Certificate of Appealability pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/21/2017. (ljb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION WESLEY JEFFERSON V. PETITIONER NO. 5:17CV00263-JM-JTR STATE OF ARKANSAS RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court=s findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Jefferson’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Doc. 1, is GRANTED; 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254, Doc. 2, is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, so that Jefferson may seek authorization from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2244(b)(3)(A), to file a successive habeas petition; and 3. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. DATED this 21st day of November, 2017. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?