Briley v. Taylor et al

Filing 12

ORDER approving and adopting 8 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; allowing Plaintiff to proceed on his excessive force and harassment claims against Defendant Taylo r; dismissing without prejudice all other claims from this action; dismissing without prejudice Defendants Hunter, Bolin, Alexander, Browley, Roberson, Tyler, and John Doe; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/14/2017. (cmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION EDDIE BRILEY v. PLAINTIFF 5:17CV00275-JM-JJV T. TAYLOR, Deputy, Jefferson County Jail; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff is allowed to proceed on his excessive force and harassment claims against Defendant Taylor. 2. All other claims are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. 3. Defendants Hunter, Bolin, Alexander, Browley, Roberson, Tyler, and John Doe are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. 4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 14th day of December, 2017. _______________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?