Briley v. Taylor et al
Filing
12
ORDER approving and adopting 8 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; allowing Plaintiff to proceed on his excessive force and harassment claims against Defendant Taylo r; dismissing without prejudice all other claims from this action; dismissing without prejudice Defendants Hunter, Bolin, Alexander, Browley, Roberson, Tyler, and John Doe; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/14/2017. (cmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
EDDIE BRILEY
v.
PLAINTIFF
5:17CV00275-JM-JJV
T. TAYLOR, Deputy,
Jefferson County Jail; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe.
No objections have been filed.
After
careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended
Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's
findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff is allowed to proceed on his excessive force and harassment claims against
Defendant Taylor.
2.
All other claims are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice.
3.
Defendants Hunter, Bolin, Alexander, Browley, Roberson, Tyler, and John Doe are
DISMISSED from this action without prejudice.
4.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 14th day of December, 2017.
_______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?