Anderson v. Kamel et al

Filing 13

ORDER adopting in their entireties 7 8 the proposed findings and partial recommendations; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff James Anderson's claims against defendant Mohammend Kamel for failure to pay an initial filing fee, and dismissi ng without prejudice all claims in Anderson's original complaint; denying 3 Anderson's motion for a preliminary injuction or protective order; allowing Anderson's claims against defendant Fade Mahmound to proceed; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/2/2018. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JAMES KENNETH ANDERSON
ADC #99355
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 5:17-CV-00292 BSM

MOHAMMED KAMEL, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The proposed findings and partial recommendations [Doc. Nos. 7, 8] submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received. No objections have
been filed. After careful consideration, the proposed findings and partial recommendations
are adopted in their entireties. Accordingly, plaintiff James Anderson’s claims against
defendant Mohammed Kamel are dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay an initial
filing fee, and all claims in Anderson’s original complaint [Doc. No. 2] are dismissed without
prejudice. Anderson’s motion for a preliminary injunction or protective order [Doc. No. 3]
is denied. Anderson’s claims against defendant Fade Mahmoud may proceed. Further, it is
certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of January 2018.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE