Funderburg v. Pine Bluff, City of

Filing 41

JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 40 Opinion and Order entered in this matter, the Court dismisses without prejudice plaintiff Jeremy Funderburg's illegal exaction claim; dismisses with prejudice Mr. Funderburg's discrimination and retaliation cl aims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993 (ACRA); and dismisses with prejudice Mr. Funderburg's claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/30/2019. (jbh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JEREMY FUNDERBURG
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:18-cv-00009 KGB

CITY OF PINE BLUFF, ARKANSAS

DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order entered in this matter, the Court dismisses without
prejudice plaintiff Jeremy Funderburg’s illegal exaction claim; dismisses with prejudice Mr.
Funderburg’s discrimination and retaliation claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §
794 (“Rehabilitation Act”); and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993 (“ACRA”), codified at Ark.
Code Ann. § 16-123-101, et seq.; and dismisses with prejudice Mr. Funderburg’s claims under the
Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq. The relief sought is denied.
So adjudged this 30th day of September, 2019.
_______________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge