Williams v. Does

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 7 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; dismissing this case without prejudice as frivolous; counting this dismissal as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/27/2018. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JESHUN WILLIAMS ADC #146670 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00031 BSM DOES DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 7] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice as frivolous; this dismissal counts as a strike for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(g); and it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal of this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of March 2018. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?