Williams v. Does
Filing
9
ORDER adopting 7 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; dismissing this case without prejudice as frivolous; counting this dismissal as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/27/2018. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JESHUN WILLIAMS
ADC #146670
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00031 BSM
DOES
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 7] submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been received. No objections have been filed. After
careful consideration, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their
entirety. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice as frivolous; this dismissal
counts as a strike for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(g); and it is certified that an in forma
pauperis appeal of this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of March 2018.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?