Stricklin v. Griffin et al

Filing 16

ORDER adopting in their entirety 13 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing without prejudice 3 6 8 Stricklin's complaint and amended complaints; counting this dismissal as a strike; denying as moot 11 Stricklin's motion for summary judgment; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/29/2018. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JOSHUA STRICKLIN,
ADC #138119
v.

PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00093 BSM

GRIFFIN, Lieutenant, et al.,
Cummins Unit, ADC

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge J. Thomas Ray [Doc. No. 13] and Joshua Stricklin’s objections [Doc. No. 15] have
been reviewed.

After de novo review of the record, the proposed findings and

recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Stricklin’s complaint and two
amended complaints [Doc. Nos. 3, 6, 8] are dismissed without prejudice, and Stricklin’s
motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 11] is denied as moot. The dismissal of this case
shall be counted as a strike, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g). It is hereby certified,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order
would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of October 2018.

_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE