Crowley v. Musclewhite et al

Filing 65

ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety 62 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 40 defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; dismissing without prejudice Crowley's claims against defendants James, Woods, Elliot, and Wade; and dismissing without prejudice any other claims. Crowley's failure-to-protect claims against defendants Musselwhite, Budnik, Robertson, Nelson, and Smith remain. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/8/2019. (ljb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION

MARK DANIEL CROWLEY
ADC #133058
v.

PLAINTIFF

No: 5:18-cv-00122 JM-PSH

MUSSELWHITE, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as
this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
is granted, and Crowley’s claims against defendants James, Woods, Elliot, and Wade are dismissed
without prejudice. Crowley’s failure-to-protect claims against defendants Musselwhite, Budnik,
Robertson, Nelson, and Smith remain; any other claims are dismissed without prejudice.
DATED this 8th day of January, 2019.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE