Crowley v. Musclewhite et al
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety 62 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 40 defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; dismissing without prejudice Crowley's claims against defendants James, Woods, Elliot, and Wade; and dismissing without prejudice any other claims. Crowley's failure-to-protect claims against defendants Musselwhite, Budnik, Robertson, Nelson, and Smith remain. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/8/2019. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MARK DANIEL CROWLEY
No: 5:18-cv-00122 JM-PSH
MUSSELWHITE, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as
this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
is granted, and Crowley’s claims against defendants James, Woods, Elliot, and Wade are dismissed
without prejudice. Crowley’s failure-to-protect claims against defendants Musselwhite, Budnik,
Robertson, Nelson, and Smith remain; any other claims are dismissed without prejudice.
DATED this 8th day of January, 2019.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?