Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
Filing
12
JUDGMENT AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER and Plaintiffs case is dismissed with prejudice and adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as set forth in the 9 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on February 21, 2012. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HARRISON DIVISION
MICHAEL L. HINDMAN
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 3:10-cv-03092
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner
Social Security Administration
DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) dated January 18,
2012, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
Arkansas. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 11).
Plaintiff objects to the Magistrate’s finding that the record in this case was adequately
developed. After reviewing the record, the Court finds the Magistrate’s reasoning on this point to be
sound and further finds that Plaintiff’s objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from
the Magistrates’ findings. The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised,
finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN
ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of February, 2012.
s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?