Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chemtura Corporation

Filing 49

ORDER approving 47 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by R. L. Johnson & Son, Inc; dismissing with prejudice counts 1 and 2 of the complaints filed by the Intervenor Plaintiffs against Johnson; all claims against R.L. Johnson & Son, Inc. d/b/a Johnson Employer Support Services have been dismissed. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on January 8, 2009. (cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W ESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION EQUA L EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CO MMISS IO N , et al. RO BERT BENNETT, et al. PLAINTIFFS INTERVENOR PLAINTIFFS VS. CASE NO. 07-CV-1025 CH EM TU RA CORPORATION D/B/A GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL CORP., et al. an d R.L. JOHNSON & SON, INC. d/b/a JOH N SO N EMPLOYER SUPPORT S E R V IC E S DEFENDANTS INTERVENOR DEFENDANT OR D ER Before the Court is the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of the remaining claims of Intervenor Plaintiffs Cecil Nicholas Delphin, Murphy Chambliss, Victor Moody, and Robert Bennett (collectively referred to as "Intervenor Plaintiffs") against Intervenor Defendant R.L. Johnson & Son, Inc. d/b/a Johnson Employer Support Services ("Johnson"). (Doc. 47). After considering the Stipulation, the Court finds that the Agreed Stipulation of Dismissal should be GRANTED. Thus, the Court hereby dismisses with prejudice the causes of action found in Counts 1 and 2 of the complaints filed by the Intervenor Plaintiffs against Johnson for violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and violation of 42 U.S.C. 1981. Because all claims against Intervenor Defendant R.L. Johnson & Son, Inc. d/b/a Joh nso n Employer Support Services have been dismissed, the Intervenor Defendant is dismissed from this case. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 8th day of January, 2009. /s/H arry F. Barnes Hon. Harry F. Barnes U nited States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?