Montize et al v. Pittman Properties et al

Filing 102

ORDER granting 69 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on March 16, 2010. (cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION ARCELIA MONTIZE, EVENCIO GARCIA and AGUSTIN GARCIA GONZALEZ PLAINTIFFS V. Case No. 07-CV-1073 PITTMAN PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP #1; D&M PITTMAN, INCORPORATED; DAWOOD AYDANI; MICKEY H. PITTMAN and PITTMAN NURSERY CORPORATION DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is a Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Separate Defendant Pittman Nursery Corporation. (Doc. 69). Plaintiffs have not responded, and the time for response has passed.1 For reasons discussed in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' causes of action against all Defendants for violations of RICO and AWPA are dismissed. Plaintiffs' claims regarding negligent supervision and respondeat superior liability are dismissed. To the extent that Plaintiffs allege any independent causes of action for conversion, breach of good faith and fair dealing, lost business opportunities, and retaliation, these claims are dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 16th day of March, 2010. /s/ Harry F. Barnes Hon. Harry F. Barnes United States District Judge 1 Plaintiffs were given until June 16, 2009, to file their response. (Doc. 75).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?