Ray v. Albemarle Corporation

Filing 75

ORDER granting 43 Motion for Summary Judgment; plaintiffs claims against defendant Thomas are dismissed without prejudice; case terminated. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on August 21, 2009. (cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION ROBERT J. RAY and AMELIA RAY PLAINTIFFS VS. CASE NO. 07-CV-1076 MARCUS THOMAS ORDER DEFENDANT Before the Court is the Second Joint Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Marcus Thomas.1 (Doc. 43). Plaintiffs Robert Ray and Amelia Ray have responded. (Doc. 46). Defendant Thomas replied. (Doc. 46). For reasons discussed in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that Defendant Thomas's Joint Motion for Summary Judgment should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Thomas are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 21st day of August, 2009. /s/ Harry F. Barnes Hon. Harry F. Barnes United States District Judge At the time the Second Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 43) was filed Albemarle Corporation was also a Defendant in this case. However, the Court previously dismissed Albemarle Corporation and rendered the Second Joint Motion for Summary Judgment moot as it applies to Albemarle Corporation. (Doc.63). 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?