Lindsey et al v. Southern Farm Bureau et al
Filing
47
ORDER granting 9 Motion for Summary Judgment of Southern Farm Bureau; denying 12 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of William Grant; granting 16 Motion for Summary Judgment of Southern Farm Bureau re cross-claim against William Grant; all claims against Southern Farm Bureau are dismissed with prejudice; Cross-claim against William Grant is dismissed as moot. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on January 28, 2009. (cnn)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION DEBORAH AND RANDELLA LINDSEY V S. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU and WILLIAM GRANT ORDER Before the Court are three motions for summary judgment. The first is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Separate Defendant Southern Farm Bureau. (Doc. 9). Separate Defendant William Grant responded. (Doc. 18) Plaintiffs Deborah and Randella Lindsey also responded. (Doc. 22). The second and third are Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 12) and Summary Judgment (Doc. 16) both filed by Separate Defendant William Grant. Separate Defendant Southern Farm Bureau responded to William Grant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 20). Separate Defendant William Grant replied to Southern Farm Bureau's Response. (Doc. 28). Plaintiffs, Deborah and Randella Lindsey responded to Separate Defendant William Grant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Doc. 23). For reasons discussed in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that Separate Defendant Farm Bureau's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 9) should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims against Separate Defendant Farm Bureau are dismissed with prejudice. The Court also finds that Separate Defendant William Grant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 12) should be and hereby is DENIED at this time. Lastly, the Court finds that Separate Defendant William Grant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. Separate Defendant Farm Bureau's cross-claim against Separate Defendant William Grant is dismissed as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 28th day of January, 2009. /s/ Harry F. Barnes Hon. Harry F. Barnes United States District Judge CASE NO. 07-CV-1103 PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
