Madding v. USA Environment, LP

Filing 8

ORDER granting (7) Joint Motion to Dismiss in cases 08-1005 and 08-1006; case dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on September 18, 2008. Associated Cases: 1:08-cv-01005-HFB, 1:08-cv-01006-HFB(cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W ESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION D A RRELL MADDING VS. U SA ENVIRONMENT, LP CASE NO. 08-CV-1005 PLAINTIFF D E FE N D A N T H Y D RO -KLEE N , LLC VS. U SA ENVIRONMENT, LP CASE NO. 08-CV-1006 P L A IN T I F F D E FE N D A N T O RD ER OF DISMISSAL Before the Court is a Joint Motion to Dismiss filed on behalf of all parties in the above styled and numbered cases. (Doc. No. 7). The parties advise the Court that the matters have been resolved through settlement and jointly request that the Plaintiffs' Complaints be dismissed with prejudice. Upon consideration, the Court finds that the motion should be and hereby is granted. IT IS TH EREFO RE CONSIDERED, ORDERED, AND ADJUDGED that the above styled and numbered causes be, and are hereby, dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if any party desires that the terms of the settlement be a part of the record herein, those terms should be reduced to writing and filed with the Court within thirty (30 ) days of the entry of this Order. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen this matter upon cause shown that the settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 18th day of September, 2008. /s/Harry F. Barnes Hon. Harry F. Barnes U nited States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?