Radford v. Norwood et al
Filing
113
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 107 ; granting 104 motion to dismiss separate defendants Thomas and Baker is granted with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on July 26, 2010. (cnn)
Radford v. Norwood et al
Doc. 113
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WE S T ER N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS E L DORADO DIVISION
T O M M Y RADFORD
P LA IN T IFF
VS.
CASE NO. 08-CV-1008
C A P TA IN DAVID NORWOOD, et al.,
DEFENDANTS
ORDER B efo re the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed on June 29, 2010, by the H o n o rab le Barry A. Bryant, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. No. 107). In his report, Judge Bryant finds that the Plaintiff has continuously failed to obey th e Court's orders regarding discovery requests propounded upon him by Defendants Jerry Thomas an d Brian Baker. Therefore, he recommends that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Thomas and B aker be dismissed with prejudice. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed b y the parties. The Court adopts in toto the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court finds that separate Defendants Jerry Thomas and Brian Baker's M o tio n to Dismiss (Doc. No. 104) should be and hereby is granted. Plaintiff's Complaint and A d d en d u m /S u p p lem en t to the Complaint as to Defendants Thomas and Baker are hereby dismissed w ith prejudice IT IS SO ORDERED, this 26 th day of July, 2010. /s/Harry F. Barnes Hon. Harry F. Barnes U n ited States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?