Mason v. IAMAW, Local W475 et al
JUDGMENT granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment and Adopting 31 Report and Recommendations; plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on April 29, 2011. (cnn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
IAMAW, LOCAL W-475
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed December 22, 2010, by the
Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(ECF No. 31). Judge Bryant recommends that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 18) be granted. Plaintiff has responded with timely objections. (ECF No. 32). After reviewing
the record de novo, the Court adopts Judge Bryant’s Report and Recommendation as its own.
In her objections to the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff alleges that the affidavits
presented by Defendant in support of its summary judgment motion are untrue. However, Plaintiff
has presented no proof that the affidavits contain false information. Moreover, Plaintiff has not
submitted any proper summary judgment evidence by way of affidavit, deposition testimony, or
discovery answers that establish a triable issue of fact on the issue that she was treated differently
because of her race.
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s objections and finds that the objections lack merit.
Accordingly, for reasons stated herein and above, as well as those contained in Judge Bryant’s
Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31), Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.
18) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 29th day of April, 2011.
/s/ Harry F. Barnes
Hon. Harry F. Barnes
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?