Lancaster et al v. Guess et al

Filing 19

ORDER granting 17 Joint Motion to Dismiss Case; Case dismissed with prejudice; issues raised relate to remedial desegregation provisions established in case 88-1142; court retains jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on July 26, 2010. (cnn)

Download PDF
L a n c a s t e r et al v. Guess et al D o c . 19 t i t U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT COURT F ' O RTHE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS E L DORADO DIVISION D O U G L A S LAIICASTER and DENISE L A N C A S T E R , INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE NATURAL PARENTS AND LEGAL GUARDIANS OF RACHEL L A I I C A S T E & A MINOR v. PLAINTIFFS NO.09-CV-10s6 D R . JERRY GUESSIN HIS CAPACITY A S SUPERINTENDENTOF CAMDEN F A I R V I E W SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 16: A N D CARY BENNETT, PHIL FOSTER, W I L L I A M McCOY, EDDIE MOORE, M A C O N PATTON, TOMMY RAINES AND C L I F F O R D STEELMAN IN THEIR C A P A C I T I E S AS MEMBERS OF THE B O A R D OF DIRECTORS OF CAMDENF A I R V I E W SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 16: HARMONY G R O V E SCHOOL DISTRICT ORDER DEFENDANTS Beforethe Court is thejoint motion of the partiesto dismissthis action. Upon consideration Court finds and concludes: the 1 . Theplaintiffs' complaintis dismissed with prejudice.The dismissal plaintiffs' of complaintconcludes litigation as to all claimsasserted this hereinby any party. All partiesareto b e a rtheirown fees,expenses, coult costs. and 2. The plaintiffs' complaintraisedissues provisions relatedto the remedialdesegregation e s t a b l i s h eandappliedto Camden d FairviewSchoolDistrict(CFSD)andHGSD in Case No. 88I l 4 2 , U . S.Dist.Ct.,W. D. Ark. For thatreason, motionof CFSDto addHGSDasa the d e f e n d a n t granted.Regarding was saidCase No. 88-1l42,theCourtfinds andconcludes the that P a g e I of 2 provisionsset forth in paragraph order,and remedial 1[C] of the November27, 1990consent paragraph of the February1,2002 orderremainin full force and effect at this time. 10 l0 1,2002orderis, however, modifiedto requirethat 3 . Paragraph of the February to at CFSDobtainapprovalof this Court prior to grantingits written consent the attendance to H G S Dof the child of a CFSDresident who is an employee HGSD,pursuant A.C.A. $ 6-18of 203. jurisdictionof this casesolelyfor thepurpose enforcing 4 . The Courtretains of the p a r t i e s 'settlement for agreement; of the aforesaid and Case No. 88-1142 the purpose of enforcingits orderstherein. I T IS SO ORDERED. APPROVEDAS TO CONTENT AND FORM: /s/ JamesM. Pratt, Jr. James Pratt,Jr. M. Attomey for Plaintiffs /s/ Allen P. Roberts A l l e n P. Roberts Attorneyfor CFSD /s/ Eueene Bramblett D. Eugene Bramblett D. Attorneyfor HGSD wEs#Rs,irDJprogT% J UL 6 200 2 $/ CHRISJOriNSOr,J, R. CTERK A-4'DEPfi4s616 P a g e2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?