Wardlaw et al v. Rural Community Insurance Services et al

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25 ; Granting 9 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings and Granting 14 Motion for Protective Order to Stay Discovery, case administratively terminated without prejudice to the parties any may reopen for good cause shown for any final order. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on October 21, 2010. (cnn)

Download PDF
Wardlaw et al v. Rural Community Insurance Services et al Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION GUY MARTIN WARDLAW et al. V. Civil No. 1:10-cv-01004 PLAINTIFFS RURAL COMMUNITY INSURANCE SERVICES FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed September 27, 2010 by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 25. Judge Bryant recommends that Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (ECF No. 9) and Defendants' Motion for Protective Order to Stay Discovery and Disclosure Requirements (ECF No. 14) be granted. The parties have not filed objections to this Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, it is ordered that the above-styled and numbered matter is administratively terminated without prejudice to the right of the parties to reopen the proceedings for good cause shown for entry of any stipulation or order, or for any other purpose required to obtain a final determination in the litigation. All motions previously referred to the Magistrate Judge should be returned to the District Court and administratively terminated. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 21st day of October, 2010. /s/ Harry F. Barnes Hon. Harry F. Barnes United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?