Temple v. Bancinsure, Inc.

Filing 31

JUDGMENT: granting defendant's 21 Motion for summary judgment; Case terminated. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 25, 2012. (cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION DAVID V. TEMPLE d/b/a SOUTHERN STATE CONSTRUCTION v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01059 BANCINSURE, INC. DEFENDANT JUDGMENT Plaintiff David Temple d/b/a Southern State Construction filed a Complaint against Defendant Bancinsure, Inc., alleging negligence, breach of contract, and promissory estoppel after Bancinsure issued a bid bond on Temple’s behalf for a bridge project for the Louisiana Department of Transportation. Temple claims that Bancinsure failed to satisfy or advise Temple of certain requirements for sureties issuing bonds on the project. As a result, Temple was not awarded the contract for the bridge project. This matter is now before the Court on Bancinsure’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 21). Temple has filed a Response. (ECF No. 22). Bancinsure has replied. (ECF No. 26). The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. For the reasons discussed in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that Bancinsure’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21) against Plaintiff should be and hereby is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED, on this 25th day of September, 2012. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Hon. Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?