Temple v. Bancinsure, Inc.

Filing 31

JUDGMENT: granting defendant's 21 Motion for summary judgment; Case terminated. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 25, 2012. (cnn)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
DAVID V. TEMPLE d/b/a
SOUTHERN STATE CONSTRUCTION
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01059

BANCINSURE, INC.

DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT

Plaintiff David Temple d/b/a Southern State Construction filed a Complaint against
Defendant Bancinsure, Inc., alleging negligence, breach of contract, and promissory estoppel
after Bancinsure issued a bid bond on Temple’s behalf for a bridge project for the Louisiana
Department of Transportation. Temple claims that Bancinsure failed to satisfy or advise Temple
of certain requirements for sureties issuing bonds on the project. As a result, Temple was not
awarded the contract for the bridge project. This matter is now before the Court on Bancinsure’s
Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 21). Temple has filed a Response. (ECF No. 22).
Bancinsure has replied. (ECF No. 26). The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration.
For the reasons discussed in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that
Bancinsure’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21) against Plaintiff should be and
hereby is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED, on this 25th day of September, 2012.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Hon. Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge