Miles v. Seale et al
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10 ; denying as moot 9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; case dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim; case considered "strike" re 28:1915(g). Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 20, 2011. (cnn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
QUADRO KENYATTA MILES
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 10-1077
DR. SEALE, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now on this 20th day of September 2011, there comes on for
consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on June
16,
2011,
by
the
Honorable
Barry
A.
Bryant,
United
Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
States
(Doc. 10).
On June 30, 2011, the Court received a motion from Plaintiff
requesting a new IFP application and an extension to return such
application.
Based upon Plaintiff’s return address, the Court
directed a change of address be entered for Plaintiff and a copy of
the report and recommendation re-mailed to Plaintiff at the new
address. The Court further extended the time for Plaintiff to file
objections from July 5, 2011 to August 1, 2011.
To date, no
objections have been filed.
The
court
sufficiently
has
reviewed
advised,
finds
this
as
case
and,
follows:
being
The
well
and
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its
entirety.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
This case is considered
a “strike” pursuant to the “three strikes” provision of the in
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the U.S. District
Clerk is directed to flag the case accordingly. Plaintiff’s motion
seeking an extension of time to file an IFP application (doc. 11)
is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?