Ellis v. Chandler et al
ORDER DENYING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 4 Report and Recommendations; ORDER RE-REFERRING CASE to Honorable Barry A. Bryant. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on February 28, 2011. Motions referred to Barry A. Bryant.(cnn)
-BAB Ellis v. Chandler et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION TYRONE ALLEN ELLIS v. Civil No. 10-1080 PLAINTIFF
CIRCUIT JUDGE LARRY CHANDLER; PROSECUTING ATTORNEY DAVID BUTLER; DAVID TALLEY, JR., Public Defender; PROSECUTING ATTORNEY RYAN PHILLIPS; and CAPTAIN TRUMAN YOUNG, Columbia County Detention Facility ORDER
consideration the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge (document #4). The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds and orders as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (R&R) under consideration is
dated January 25, 2011, and there does not appear to be any objection or any other response to it by either the plaintiff or any defendant. The R&R notes that plaintiff's complaint was provisionally filed on December 15, 2010; that plaintiff was directed to submit a complete in forma pauperis (IFP) application or pay the $350 filing fee by January 11, 2011; and that, as of January 25, 2011 (the date of the R&R), plaintiff had not complied with the Court's directions. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge recommended the case be dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to obey an order of the Court and failure to prosecute this action. 2. While considering the January 25, 2011, R&R during the
fourteen (14) day period allotted to the parties in which to make any written objections they might have to the R&R, it came to the Court's attention that, on January 31, 2011, a Notice of Change of Address was
docketed in this case.
This pleading -- prepared and filed by
plaintiff -- noted that he had been recently transferred from the Columbia County Detention Facility to a facility within the Arkansas Department of Corrections. Moreover, on February 16, 2011, and before this Court had opportunity to act on the R&R, an application by plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis was docketed. The Magistrate foregoing Judge happenings had occurred, the of course, to this after Court the for
consideration. 3. In light of the foregoing, it would appear that a change in
plaintiff's address likely affected the timeliness of his pleadings and his ability to comply with the Court's orders. Accordingly, the
Court will decline to accept and act on the R&R's recommendation that plaintiff's cause be dismissed. 4. The plaintiff is reminded that he is obliged to keep the
Court informed at all times as to his current address and contact information and that any future instances where he claims not to have timely received Court Orders will most likely not be accepted nor his failures to comply excused. 5. The Court thanks the Magistrate Judge for the R&R but, for
reasons mentioned above, declines to accept his recommendation to dismiss plaintiff's case. IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Jimm Larry Hendren JIMM LARRY HENDREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?