Burris v. Clements et al

Filing 10

ORDER denying 9 Motion for Reconsideration of 7 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on February 10, 2012. (cnn)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
CHRIS BURRIS

PLAINTIFF

v.

No. 11-1051

TONYA CLEMENTS, Store Clerk,
Tobacco Superstore; DETECTIVE
TODD SURBER, El Dorado Police
Department and LIEUTENANT NICHOLAS,
El Dorado Police Department

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Now on this 10th day of February 2012, there comes on for
consideration Plaintiff’s pro se motion requesting the Court to
reconsider

its

order

adopting

the

Magistrate’s

report

and

recommendation, denying his motion for leave to proceed IFP and
dismissing his case as the claims asserted are frivolous, fail
to state claims upon which relief may be granted, or are not
cognizable.

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-ii).

Plaintiff contends he requested an extension of time to
object to the report and recommendation, however, nothing was
received by the Court.

In any event, Plaintiff set forth the

substance of his objections in the current motion, and the Court
has reviewed the matter de novo.

Plaintiff’S objections are

non-specific and do not address the reasons for the dismissal of
his claims as set forth in the report and recommendation (doc.
6) or the order adopting the Magistrate’s recommendation (doc.

AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)

7).

Plaintiff’s Motion should be and hereby is DENIED (doc. 9).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge

AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)