Burris v. Clements et al

Filing 10

ORDER denying 9 Motion for Reconsideration of 7 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on February 10, 2012. (cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION CHRIS BURRIS PLAINTIFF v. No. 11-1051 TONYA CLEMENTS, Store Clerk, Tobacco Superstore; DETECTIVE TODD SURBER, El Dorado Police Department and LIEUTENANT NICHOLAS, El Dorado Police Department DEFENDANTS ORDER Now on this 10th day of February 2012, there comes on for consideration Plaintiff’s pro se motion requesting the Court to reconsider its order adopting the Magistrate’s report and recommendation, denying his motion for leave to proceed IFP and dismissing his case as the claims asserted are frivolous, fail to state claims upon which relief may be granted, or are not cognizable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-ii). Plaintiff contends he requested an extension of time to object to the report and recommendation, however, nothing was received by the Court. In any event, Plaintiff set forth the substance of his objections in the current motion, and the Court has reviewed the matter de novo. Plaintiff’S objections are non-specific and do not address the reasons for the dismissal of his claims as set forth in the report and recommendation (doc. 6) or the order adopting the Magistrate’s recommendation (doc. AO72A (Rev. 8/82) 7). Plaintiff’s Motion should be and hereby is DENIED (doc. 9). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?