Burris v. Clements et al
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety. Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in DENIED and the Complaint is DISMISSED as the claims asserted are frivolous, fail to state claims upon which relief may be granted, or are not cognizable. Further, the Clerk is directed to collect the $350 filing fee pursuant to the terms of the PLRA. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on November 28, 2011. (mfr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
CHRIS BURRIS
PLAINTIFF
v.
No. 11-1051
TONYA CLEMENTS, Store Clerk,
Tobacco Superstore; DETECTIVE
TODD SURBER, El Dorado Police
Department and LIEUTENANT NICHOLAS,
El Dorado Police Department
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now on this 28th day of November 2011, there comes on for
consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on
November 2, 2011, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United
States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(Doc. 6).
No objections were filed.
The court has reviewed this case and, being well and
sufficiently
advised,
finds
as
follows:
The
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in
its entirety.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to
proceed IFP (doc. 1) is DENIED and the Complaint is DISMISSED as
the claims asserted are frivolous, fail to state claims upon
which relief may be granted, or are not cognizable.
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-ii).
See 28
Further, the U.S. District Clerk
is directed to collect the $350 filing fee pursuant to the terms
of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
See e.g., In re Tyler, 110
F.3d 528, 529-30 (8th
Cir. 1997)(Under
PLRA,
prisoners are
responsible for filing fees from the moment the civil action is
filed).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?