Monk v. Foster, et al

Filing 48

ORDER re 43 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations; Case remains dismissed, the court will not consider granting any further extensions. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on May 6, 2013. (cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION EVERICK L. MONK VS. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 1:11-cv-1054 FORMER SHERIFF FOSTER; FORMER CAPTAIN TRUMAN YOUNG; LIEUTENANT JANET DELANEY; FORMER SERGEANT DAVIS; and NURSE MANESS DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Objection to Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 47). Plaintiff’s objection relates to the Report and Recommendation entered by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant on February 12, 2013. (ECF No. 42). Plaintiff did not file a timely objection to the Report and Recommendation, and on March 4, 2013, this Court adopted the Report and Recommendation in toto and the case was dismissed with prejudice. (ECF No. 43). After the case was dismissed, Plaintiff requested that he be given until April 1, 2013 to file an objection to the Report and Recommendation. The Court granted the extension and stated that a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation would be conducted if Plaintiff’s objection was submitted by April 1, 2013. (ECF No. 46). Plaintiff filed the present objection on May 2, 2013, over a month past the April 1, 2013 deadline. Accordingly, the objection is untimely and will not be considered. This case remains dismissed, and the Court will not consider granting any further extensions. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 6th day of May, 2013. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?