Monk v. Foster, et al
Filing
48
ORDER re 43 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations; Case remains dismissed, the court will not consider granting any further extensions. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on May 6, 2013. (cnn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
EVERICK L. MONK
VS.
PLAINTIFF
Civil No. 1:11-cv-1054
FORMER SHERIFF FOSTER;
FORMER CAPTAIN TRUMAN YOUNG;
LIEUTENANT JANET DELANEY;
FORMER SERGEANT DAVIS; and
NURSE MANESS
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Objection to Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 47).
Plaintiff’s objection relates to the Report and Recommendation entered by the Honorable Barry A.
Bryant on February 12, 2013. (ECF No. 42). Plaintiff did not file a timely objection to the Report
and Recommendation, and on March 4, 2013, this Court adopted the Report and Recommendation
in toto and the case was dismissed with prejudice. (ECF No. 43). After the case was dismissed,
Plaintiff requested that he be given until April 1, 2013 to file an objection to the Report and
Recommendation. The Court granted the extension and stated that a de novo review of the Report
and Recommendation would be conducted if Plaintiff’s objection was submitted by April 1, 2013.
(ECF No. 46).
Plaintiff filed the present objection on May 2, 2013, over a month past the April 1, 2013
deadline. Accordingly, the objection is untimely and will not be considered. This case remains
dismissed, and the Court will not consider granting any further extensions.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 6th day of May, 2013.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?