Livingston v. Central AR Development Council

Filing 25

JUDGMENT in favor of Central AR Development Council against Pearlie Ann Livingston granting 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Central AR Development Council; case dismissed. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on May 8, 2013. (cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION PEARLIE ANN LIVINGSTON VS. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 1:12-CV-1054 CENTRAL ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL DEFENDANT JUDGMENT Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of Defendant Central Arkansas Development Council. (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff has filed a response (ECF No. 20), and Defendant has filed a reply. (ECF No. 23). The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that summary judgment in favor of CADC is appropriate as to Plaintiff’s age, race, and disability discrimination claims and retaliation claims. Accordingly, the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 13) should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED, on this 8th day of May, 2013. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge 1 Plaintiff’s Title VII race discrimination claim is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff’s ACRA race discrimination claim is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff’s age discrimination claim is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff’s disability discrimination claim is dismissed without prejudice.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?