Jones v. Miller et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 38 MOTION to Dismiss Party filed by Carolyn Simmons, Randy Pete, Rueben Gonzales, Mike Warren, Thomas Miller, Brian Martin, Don Hollingsworth, Mike Jolly, Terrence Moore; separate defendants Brian Martin, Thomas Miller, Mike Warren, Don Hollingsworth, Terrance Moore, Mike Jolly, Ruben Gonzales, Carolyn Simmons, Randy Peek and Mark Danzy are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on July 21, 2014. (cnn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
BENJAMIN MUHAMMAD JONES
CASE NO. 12-CV-1071
THOMAS MILLER, et al.
BENJAMIN MUHAMMAD JONES
CASE NO. 12-CV-1091
MIKE JOLLY, et al.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed April 29, 2014, by the Honorable
Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 52.
Judge Bryant recommends that Separate Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with
a Court Order (ECF No. 38) be granted. Plaintiff has responded with objections, and the Court has
reviewed the objections. ECF No. 54. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that
Plaintiff’s objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and
After reviewing the record de novo, the Court adopts the Report and
Recommendation in toto.
Plaintiff’s objections do not address why he failed to comply with a court order, and Plaintiff does
not deny that he failed to do so. Plaintiff’s objections generally consist of a list of claims against
Accordingly, Separate Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with a Court
Order (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against the following Defendants are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: Brian Martin, Thomas Miller, Mike Warren, Don
Hollingsworth, Terrance Moore, Mike Jolly, Ruben Gonzales, Carolyn Simmons, Randy Peek, and
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 21st day of July, 2014.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?