Clanton et al v. Risk Management Agency et al

Filing 18

JUDGMENT: denying plaintiffs' 10 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting defendants' 14 Motion for Summary Judgment in accordance with Memorandum Opinion re 17 . Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on February 4, 2015. (cnn)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
RANDY CLANTON, JR., SAMUEL
CLANTON, HERITAGE FARMS, GUY
MARTIN WARDLAW, CRAIG WARDLAW,
MARTY LEE WARDLAW, J&B CARE, INC.,
and PATTSVILLE FARMS, INC.
v.

PLAINTIFFS

Case No. 1:13-cv-01063

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Acting
Through the United States Department of
Agriculture, Risk Management Agency

DEFENDANT

JUDGMENT
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 10). Defendant
did not file a response. Instead, Defendant filed its own Motion for Summary Judgment and For
Leave to File Exhibit not part of the Administrative Record. (ECF No. 14). Plaintiffs did not
respond to Defendant’s Motion. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion of even date,
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 10) is DENIED. Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED. Defendant’s request for leave to file an exhibit
not part of the administrative record is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 4th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge