Clanton et al v. Risk Management Agency et al

Filing 18

JUDGMENT: denying plaintiffs' 10 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting defendants' 14 Motion for Summary Judgment in accordance with Memorandum Opinion re 17 . Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on February 4, 2015. (cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION RANDY CLANTON, JR., SAMUEL CLANTON, HERITAGE FARMS, GUY MARTIN WARDLAW, CRAIG WARDLAW, MARTY LEE WARDLAW, J&B CARE, INC., and PATTSVILLE FARMS, INC. v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 1:13-cv-01063 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Acting Through the United States Department of Agriculture, Risk Management Agency DEFENDANT JUDGMENT Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 10). Defendant did not file a response. Instead, Defendant filed its own Motion for Summary Judgment and For Leave to File Exhibit not part of the Administrative Record. (ECF No. 14). Plaintiffs did not respond to Defendant’s Motion. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 10) is DENIED. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED. Defendant’s request for leave to file an exhibit not part of the administrative record is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 4th day of February, 2015. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?