Bell et al v. Mine Safety Appliances Company et al

Filing 199

JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendant Ruemelin Manufacturing Company, Inc.; granting 103 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 143 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on February 26, 2016. (mll)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
VICKIE BELL; PHILLIP B. BELL, JR.
and JONATHAN BELL
v.

PLAINTIFFS

Case No. 1:13-cv-01075

MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES;
RUEMELIN MANUFACTURING
COMPANY, INC.; PULMOSAN
SAFETY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION;
CLEMCO INDUSTRIES, INC.; and
JOHN DOES 1-7

DEFENDANT

JUDGMENT
Before the Court are two Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Ruemelin
Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“Ruemelin”). (ECF Nos. 103 & 143). Plaintiffs have responded to
these motions. (ECF Nos. 121 & 155). Ruemelin has filed Replies. (ECF Nos. 124 & 160).
Plaintiffs have filed a surresponse. (ECF No. 168). Defendant has filed a surreply. (ECF No. 183).
For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 143) is GRANTED, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(ECF No. 103) is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant Ruemelin
Manufacturing Company, Inc.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 26th day of February, 2016.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge