Mike Rogers Drilling Company, Inc. v. Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corporation et al

Filing 12

ORDER granting 11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corporation answer due 6/9/2014; Riteco Supply answer due 6/9/2014. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on May 2, 2014. (mll)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION MIKE ROGERS DRILLING COMPANY VS. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:14-cv-1015 NIPPON STEEL AND SUMITOMO METAL CORPORATION; PETRO MATERIALS USA, INC.; and RITECO SUPPLY DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is a Second Agreed Motion to Extend Response Deadline filed on behalf of the parties. (ECF No. 11). The parties move the Court to extend the deadline for Defendants Riteco Supply and Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corporation to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. (ECF No. 1). Upon consideration, the Court is satisfied that good cause for the motion has been shown. Accordingly, the Court finds that the motion (ECF No. 11) should be and hereby is GRANTED. Defendants’ responses to Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) are due on or before June 9, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of May, 2014. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?