Johnson v. Patterson et al

Filing 27

ORDER granting 26 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff's responses to Defendant's interrogatories and requests for production of documents are due on or before July 15, 2016. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on July 5, 2016. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION WILLIE MAE JOHNSON VS. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 14-CV-1044 TOMMY PATTERSON and MAXINE CANTERBERRY DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is Separate Defendant Maxine Canterbury’s Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 26). Defendant seeks to compel Plaintiff to respond to certain interrogatories and requests for production of documents that are past due. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion, and the time to do so has passed. The matter is ripe for the Court’s consideration. Defendant served her interrogatories and requests for production upon Plaintiff on March 24, 2016. (ECF No. 26, Exh. 1-2). Plaintiff has failed to respond. Rule 34(b)(2)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that Plaintiff’s responses to Defendant’s discovery requests are due within 30 days after being served. Because Plaintiff has failed to respond, Defendant’s motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s responses to Defendant’s interrogatories and requests for production of documents are due on or before July 15, 2016. A failure to obey the Court’s order may result in the dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 5th day of July, 2016. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?