Johnson v. Patterson et al

Filing 47

JUDGMENT granting 38 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 41 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 43 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on December 30, 2016. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION WILLIE MAE JOHNSON V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 14-CV-01044 TOMMY PATTERSON; and MAXINE CANTERBERRY DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Before the Court are two motions filed by Separate Defendant Tommy Patterson: (1) a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and (2) a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. ECF Nos. 38, 41. Also before the Court is Separate Defendant Maxine Canterberry’s Motion Adopting Arguments and Brief of Separate Defendant Tommy Patterson. ECF No. 43. Plaintiff has responded. ECF Nos. 44, 45. The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. For the reasons discussed in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that Separate Defendants’ Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings and Motions for Partial Summary Judgment should be and hereby are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims under the ADA and FHA in regard to Separate Defendants Tommy Patterson and Maxine Canterberry are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 30th day of December, 2016. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?