Johnson v. Patterson et al
JUDGMENT granting 38 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 41 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 43 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on December 30, 2016. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
WILLIE MAE JOHNSON
CASE NO. 14-CV-01044
TOMMY PATTERSON; and
Before the Court are two motions filed by Separate Defendant Tommy Patterson: (1) a
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and (2) a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. ECF
Nos. 38, 41. Also before the Court is Separate Defendant Maxine Canterberry’s Motion
Adopting Arguments and Brief of Separate Defendant Tommy Patterson. ECF No. 43. Plaintiff
has responded. ECF Nos. 44, 45. The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration.
For the reasons discussed in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that
Separate Defendants’ Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings and Motions for Partial Summary
Judgment should be and hereby are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims under the ADA and FHA in
regard to Separate Defendants Tommy Patterson and Maxine Canterberry are hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 30th day of December, 2016.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?