Gambler Well Services, Inc. v. OneBeacon Insurance Company et al
Filing
57
ORDER granting 56 Motion to Dismiss separate party defendant, Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on April 21, 2016. (cnn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
GAMBLER WELL SERVICES, INC.
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 1:14-cv-01068
ATLANTIC SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY
DEFENDANTS
ATLANTIC SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY
THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF
v.
WHECO CORPORATION
THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT
ATLANTIC SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY
THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF
v.
ENGLE MARTIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT
ORDER
Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Claims Against Defendant Atlantic Specialty
Insurance Company With Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Gambler Well Services, Inc. and Defendant
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company (“ASIC”). (ECF No. 56). Gambler has fully resolved all
claims in this action against ASIC, and the parties request that those claims be dismissed with
prejudice. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), an action may be dismissed by
a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties.
Accordingly, all of Plaintiff Gambler’s claims against Defendant ASIC are hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE subject to the terms of the settlement agreement. If any party
desires that the terms of settlement be a part of the record, those terms should be reduced to writing
and filed with the court within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order. The court retains
jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen this action upon cause shown that the settlement has
not been completed and further litigation is necessary. ASIC’s third party claims against Wheco
Corporation and Engle Martin & Associates, Inc. remain pending before the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 21st day of April, 2016.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?