Gray v. Hopkins et al

Filing 33

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 31 in case 1:16-cv-01012-SOH-BAB; and #14 in case 1:16-cv-01022-SOH-BAB; granting (25) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 1:16-cv-01012-SOH-BAB; separate defendant Dr. Hopkins is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 26, 2017. Associated Cases: 1:16-cv-01012-SOH-BAB, 1:16-cv-01022-SOH-BAB(cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION ORLANDO DESHUN GRAY v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 1:16-cv-1012 DR. HOPKINS, et al. DEFENDANTS CONSOLIDATED WITH ORLANDO DESHUN GRAY v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 1:16-cv-1022 DR. HOPKINS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed January 5, 2017, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 14. Judge Bryant recommends that Separate Defendant Dr. Deanna Hopson’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) be granted. No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, Separate Defendant Dr. Deanna Hopson’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED, and all claims against Separate Defendant Dr. Deanna Hopson are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 26th day of January, 2017. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?