Green v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 21

JUDGMENT/ORDER AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER and Plaintiffs case is dismissed with prejudice and adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as set forth in the 20 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 8, 2018. (cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION EVA J. GREEN v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:16-cv-1068 CAROLYN W. COLVIN Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT JUDGMENT Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed December 14, 2017, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 20). Judge Bryant recommends that the Court affirm the administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying Plaintiff Eva J. Green’s applications for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. 1 Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has reviewed the case, and being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be adopted in its entirety. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29) in toto. Accordingly, the ALJ’s decision denying benefits to Plaintiff is hereby AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 8th day of January, 2018. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge 1 Specifically, Judge Bryant states that the ALJ’s findings were supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; that the ALJ did not fail to comply with the Court’s previous remand instructions; and that the ALJ did not err in assessing Plaintiff’s credibility, her Residual Functional Capacity, and her ability to perform her Past Relevant Work.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?