Cameron v. Vescom Corporation et al
ORDER re 12 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Harold Cameron, separate defendant, Healthplans, Inc. dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on June 14, 2017. (cnn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
Case No. 1:16-cv-1098
VESCOM CORPORATION and
Before the Court is Plaintiff Harold Cameron’s Stipulation of Dismissal. (ECF No. 12).
Plaintiff requests that all of his claims against Defendant HealthPlans, Inc. (“HealthPlans”) be
dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), an
action may be dismissed by “a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.”
The instant stipulation of dismissal is signed by all parties who have appeared in this matter. 1
Accordingly, all of Plaintiff’s claims against HealthPlans are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s claims against Vescom remain in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of June, 2017.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Although Defendant Vescom Corporation (“Vescom”) did not sign the stipulation of dismissal, this does not
preclude dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims against HealthPlans due to the fact that Vescom has not retained counsel,
filed any documents, or otherwise appeared in this matter. See United States v. Altman, 750 F.2d 684, 695 (8th Cir.
1984) (“[Rule 41] permits the dismissal of an action upon the signing of a stipulation by all parties who have
appeared in the case.”).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?