Cameron v. Vescom Corporation et al
Filing
22
JUDGMENT in favor of Harold Cameron against Vescom Corporation in the amount of $58,057.43, with pre-judgment accruing at the rate allowable by law from December 23, 2013, until the date of entry of this Judgment, and post-judgment interest accr uing at the rate allowable by law from the date of entry of this Judgment until the judgment is paid; plaintiff also awarded $12,152.50 attorneys fees; $454.81 costs; and awarded $34,500.00, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(c)(1). Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 6, 2017. (cnn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EL DORADO DIVISION
HAROLD CAMERON
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 1:16-cv-1098
VESCOM CORPORATION
DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
Before the Court is Plaintiff Harold Cameron’s Motion for Default Judgment. (ECF No.
16). Defendant Vescom Corporation (“Vescom”) has not responded to the motion, and the time
to do so has passed. On August 15, 2017, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF
No. 19). The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration.
For the reasons set forth in the Order of even date, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion
(ECF No. 16) should be and hereby is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Harold Cameron and against Defendant Vescom
Corporation in the amount of $58,057.43, with pre-judgment accruing at the rate allowable by law
from December 23, 2013, until the date of entry of this Judgment, and post-judgment interest
accruing at the rate allowable by law from the date of entry of this Judgment until the judgment is
paid. Plaintiff is also awarded $12,152.50 in reasonable attorney’s fees and $454.81 in reasonable
costs. Finally, Plaintiff is awarded $34,500.00, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(c)(1).
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 6th day of September, 2017.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?