Hennington et al v. First National Bank of Crossett et al

Filing 42

JUDGMENT/ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT; See order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 18, 2019. (cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION JOHNNY HENNINGTON and VIKKI M. HENNINGTON v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 1:18-cv-1009 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CROSSETT and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Separate Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”). (ECF No. 16). Separate Defendant First National Bank of Crossett (“First National”) has adopted and joined in the motion. (ECF No. 19). Plaintiffs Johnny Hennington and Vikki M. Hennington (“Mr. Hennington” and “Mrs. Hennington” or, collectively, “the Henningtons”) have responded. (ECF No. 24). Wells Fargo has replied. (ECF No. 27). For the reasons stated in the Court’s memorandum opinion of even date, the Court finds that Wells Fargo’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16) should be and hereby is GRANTED insofar as it requests dismissal of the Henningtons’ TILA claim. The Henningtons’ TILA claim is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Henningtons’ remaining state-law claim and, thus, the Clerk of Court is directed to immediately REMAND this case to the Circuit Court of Ashley County, Arkansas, for adjudication of the Henningtons’ state-law claim. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 18th day of March, 2019. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?