Linley et al v. Kholor et al

Filing 18

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on April 26, 2021. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION MARK LINLEY and KATHY LINLEY v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 1:20-cv-1018 AZIMDZHON KHOLOR and ANNETT HOLDINGS, INC. d/b/a TMC DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice. (ECF No. 17). The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration. An action may be dismissed by “a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). “Caselaw concerning stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval.” Gardiner v. A.H. Robins Co., 747 F.2d 1180, 1189 (8th Cir. 1984). Thus, Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants were effectively dismissed when the parties filed the instant stipulation. However, this order issues for the purpose of maintaining the Court’s docket. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 26th day of April, 2021. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?