Robinson, et al v. Option One Mortgage
ORDER that 57 Objections to Report and Recommendations filed by George C Robinson is overruled ; further adopting in toto 56 Report and Recommendations and denying 55 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis ; further plaintiff is directed to pay the appellate filing fee of $505.00. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 24, 2014. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
GEORGE C. ROBINSON and
Civil No. 02-2282
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP.
Now on this 24th day of March, 2014, comes on for consideration
the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document #56),
and the objections thereto.
The Court, being well and sufficiently
advised, finds and orders as follows:
The plaintiff George Robinson filed a motion to appeal in
forma pauperis (IFP)(Doc. 55).
U.S. Magistrate Judge Marschewski, in his Report and
Recommendation, recommended that the motion be denied.
The plaintiff filed timely objections in which he states
that it would be a financial hardship to pay the appeal fee.
After a review of the matter, the Court finds that
plaintiff’s objections offer nothing either in law or fact which
would warrant rejection of the Report and Recommendation.
objections of the plaintiff (document #57) will, therefore, be
overruled and the Report and Recommendation will be adopted in toto.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED
that the objections of the plaintiff (document #57) to the
Report And Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge should be, and they
hereby are, overruled;
that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
(document #56) should be, and it hereby is, adopted in toto; and
* that the motion to proceed IFP (Doc. 55) is denied and the
plaintiff is directed to pay the appellate filing fee of $505.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Jimm Larry Hendren
JIMM LARRY HENDREN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?