Humphrey v. Franklin County, Arkansas et al

Filing 123

ORDER that this case be, and is hereby, dismissed with prejudice, subject to the terms of the settlement agreement. The court retains jurisdiction to vacate this order and to reopen the action upon cause shown that settlement has not been completed and that a party wishes this court to enforce the settlement agreement specifically. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on January 20, 2009. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E ST E RN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS F O RT SMITH DIVISION M A RV I N J. HUMPHREY vs. REED HAYNES, et al. O R DE R C A SE No. 2:05-CV-2138-RTD P L AI N TI F F D E FE N DA N TS NOW on this 20th day of January, 2009, comes on for c o ns i de r at i on the above-styled cause. I T APPEARING to the court that the matter has been settled, c o un s el for all parties having so advised the court, it is ORDERED t h at the case be, and it is hereby, dismissed with prejudice, subject t o the terms of the settlement agreement. I f any party desires to make the terms of settlement a part of t h e record herein, those terms should be reduced to writing and filed w i t h the court within thirty (30) days from the file date of this o r de r . T h e court retains jurisdiction to vacate this order and to r e op e n the action upon cause shown that settlement has not been c o mpleted and that a party wishes this court to enforce the s e tt l em e nt agreement specifically. I T IS SO ORDERED. / S /R o be r t T. Dawson___ R O BE R T T. DAWSON U n it e d States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?