Lindsay v. Attebury et al

Filing 2

ORDER directing the Plaintiff's complaint be filed Nunc Pro Tunc as of May 30, 2006, and the clerk is directed to file the in forma pauperis application and complaint, and a determination as to service upon Defendants will be made at a later date. Signed by Judge Beverly Stites Jones on June 12, 2006. (sh)

Download PDF
Lindsay v. Attebury et al Doc. 2 Case 2:06-cv-02066-RTD Document 2 Filed 06/12/2006 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS OF' F O R TSMITHDIVISION D O R I S A, LINDSAY PLAINTIFF CivjlNo.06- 66 a0 JEFF.ATIEBURY: PHIL ATTEBTJRY.IEREI\{Y ; ATT EB U R Y ;KENTUCKY FRIEDCHICKEN:\'UM BRANDS DEFENDANTS ORDER D o r i s A. Lindsay submittedthis pro 6e action for filirtg on May 30, 2006. The clerk is d i r e c t e dto frle the inJorma pauperis (IFP) applicationand complaint nunc pro tunc to May 30, 2 0 0 6 . The undetsigned determineat a latertime whetherthoapplicationto pftrceed shotrld will IFP b e grantedand whotherthe oomplaintshouldbe sowedon ths defendants. l T lS SO ORDER-EDthis 9th dav of June2006. BBVERLYtrI]ITEJONES S U N I T EDSTATES MAGISTRATE JUDCE AriKANsAs wESTERN DFtlHB" 12 J U N 2006 CHBIfi. Jtrlllsol'l,CLERK S FI CI-EBK DEPIflY COURT U .S.DISTRICT -l- AO72A (Rev.8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?