Lindsay v. Attebury et al

Filing 2

ORDER directing the Plaintiff's complaint be filed Nunc Pro Tunc as of May 30, 2006, and the clerk is directed to file the in forma pauperis application and complaint, and a determination as to service upon Defendants will be made at a later date. Signed by Judge Beverly Stites Jones on June 12, 2006. (sh)

Lindsay v. Attebury et al

Doc. 2

Case 2:06-cv-02066-RTD

Document 2

Filed 06/12/2006

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS OF' F O R TSMITHDIVISION
D O R I S A, LINDSAY PLAINTIFF

CivjlNo.06- 66 a0
JEFF.ATIEBURY: PHIL ATTEBTJRY.IEREI\{Y ; ATT EB U R Y ;KENTUCKY FRIEDCHICKEN:\'UM BRANDS

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
D o r i s A. Lindsay submittedthis pro 6e action for filirtg on May 30, 2006. The clerk is d i r e c t e dto frle the inJorma pauperis (IFP) applicationand complaint nunc pro tunc to May 30, 2 0 0 6 . The undetsigned determineat a latertime whetherthoapplicationto pftrceed shotrld will IFP b e grantedand whotherthe oomplaintshouldbe sowedon ths defendants. l T lS SO ORDER-EDthis 9th dav of June2006.

BBVERLYtrI]ITEJONES S
U N I T EDSTATES MAGISTRATE JUDCE

AriKANsAs wESTERN DFtlHB" 12 J U N 2006
CHBIfi. Jtrlllsol'l,CLERK S FI CI-EBK DEPIflY

COURT U .S.DISTRICT

-l-

AO72A (Rev.8/82)

Dockets.Justia.com