Kirby v. Roth et al
ORDER granting 47 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery( The parties shall have until and including 2/19/10 to complete discovery in this case.); and granting 50 Motion to Continue( Bench Trial RESET for 4/15/2010, 10:00 AM in Fort S mith -- 2nd flr (Rm 226) before Honorable James R. Marschewski.).Further denying as moot 38 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 43 Motion for subpoena ; denying as moot 44 Motion for subpoena ; denying as moot 45 Motion for subpoena; denying as moot 51 Motion for subpoena ; denying as moot 52 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 54 Motion for subpoena ; denying as moot 56 Motion for subpoena ; denying as moot 59 Motion for subpoena. Plaintiff may resubmit the names of his potential witnesses in accordance with the Scheduling Order 49 . Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on December 21, 2009. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION
DERROL DEE KIRBY, III v. Civil No. 06-2168
JOHN ROTH, Ex-Chief of Police, Barling, Arkansas Police Department; LARRY MERCHANT, next in charge under Police Chief, Barling Police Department; CITY OF BARLING; KEVIN DOUGAN, Barling Police Department Patrolman; JOHN BARBOR, Barling Police Department Patrolman ORDER
Now before the Court is the Motion to Continue (Doc. 50). Defendants seek to reset the date of the bench trial currently scheduled for February 2, 2010, due to a scheduling conflict. Plaintiff has not responded to this Motion, but has filed his own Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (Doc. 47), which is also pending before the Court. Upon due consideration, and for good cause shown, the Motion to Continue (Doc. 50) is hereby GRANTED. The Bench Trial previously scheduled in this case shall be reset to April 15, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. The Scheduling Order (Doc. 49) shall remain in effect in all other respects. Accordingly, the Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (Doc. 47) is also hereby GRANTED. The parties shall have until and including February 19, 2010 to complete discovery in this case. The following is also hereby ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's Motions to Compel (Docs. 38 and 52) are DENIED as moot as the time for discovery has been extended. Plaintiff may resubmit any unanswered discovery -1-
to the Defendants. 2) Motions for Subpoenas (Docs. 43, 44, 45, 54 and 56) are also DENIED as moot as these Motions seek to subpoena information which may be provided by the Defendants. As discovery has been extended in this case, requests for this information may be resubmitted to the Defendants. 3) Motions for Subpoenas (Doc. 51 and 59) are Motions by Plaintiff to subpoena certain individuals to the Bench Trial scheduled in this case. As the date of this bench trial has been rescheduled, these Motions are DENIED as moot. Plaintiff may resubmit the names of his potential witnesses in accordance with the Scheduling Order (Doc. 49). IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of December 2009.
/s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?