Cantrell v. Beebe et al
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Jimmy Shane Cantrell. Objections to R&R due by 5/14/2007. Signed by Judge James R. Marschewski on April 24, 2007. (sh)
Cantrell v. Beebe et al
Doc. 6
Case 2:07-cv-02038-RTD
Document 6
Filed 04/26/2007
Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATESDISTRICTCOLIRT WE S T E R NDISTRICTOF ARKANSAS F O R TSMITHDTVISION JIMMYS}IANE(IANTREI,I-
PLAINTIFF
c i v i r Nor.J03fr o
M I K E BEEISE, Governor the Stateof of A r k a n s a s Fomer AttorneyGeltcral; and S G T .WES'I'tsROOK, Prnperty Olliccr a t thc EastArkansas RegionalLlnit; G R E GIL\SMON, Warden,EastArkansas R c g i o n aUnit; LARI{Y NORRIS. l D i r e c t o r ,Arkansas llopartment Conection; of A R K A N S A S BOARD OF CORRECTION; S G T ,WOFFOR-D, Transportation Officer with the ArkansasDepartmentof Concction; M l t . CLEMMONS,Oflicct, EastArkansas R e g i o n aUnit; MIt. BIITLER, OfficLr,Easr l Arkansas Regionaltjnit; .I()IIN DOn, Unknown O f t i c e rworkingat the backgate the EastArkansas of R e g i o n aUnit; JAMES Mc(IORMACK, Clerk,Uniltrj l Statcs Dstrict fburt for the Eastom Dishict of A r k a n s a sJOIIN DOE CLERKS,DeputyClerks ; f o r the Flastem District of4rkansas;and D A V I D WHITE, Warden,MaximumSecurif U n i t , Trtcker. Arkansas
DEFTNDANTS
P l a i n ti ff, .limmy shanecautrell, is an inmatcin the Maximum seourityunit of the Arkansas Depafiment comection rucker, Arkansas.He submittcd coffplaiflt frrt filing of at a i n thisdistrict pursuant 42 u.s.c. $ Ig83. Thecomplaint provisionally to was filedsubject to a latetdetemination ofwhetherplaintiff should granted formapauperis be in status whether and thecomplaint shouldbe served.
-I-
AO72A (Rev.8/82)
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:07-cv-02038-RTD
Document 6
Filed 04/26/2007
Page 2 of 4
names defendants Govenrot Cantrell as the ofthe Statc ofArkzursas. Arkansas tho Board of correction,vadousofficersemployed th EastArkansas at Regionalunit of the Arkzmsas Depart me n t Corection,the Warden theMaximumSecurity of of Unit, andthe Clerk of Court of thc Eastem Distriotof Arkansas well asthc dcputyclerksemployecl as there. Amongother things,Cantrcllcontends constitutional his fightswercviolatcdwhenhis legalmaterials wcre placed storagc thc EastArkansas in at Regional uflit (EARIJ)on December 2006. cantrcll 19, conten dtheArkansas s Department ofCorrection (AI)Ci rtelenriants rcfrrsed release Iegal to the matcria l s him whenhewastransfened to fromtheEARUto theMaximumSecurityUnit (MSU). He alsocontends ADc policy regarding thc inmatepropertycontrolcontains ambiguous anrl contradi c to rIanguage. y Ca n tre lchallenges ADC lirnitations thcposscssion l the on ofpersonal property lcgal and matetial s inmatcs. by Additionally, contends personalpropertywas promptlyretumed he his not to him attheendof hispunitivetermonJanuary I, 2007.[r thisregard, I contcnds Cantrell there are no adequate proceduralsafeguards preventthe arbitrary,capdcious,zurdretaliatory to dcprivati o n property. of to Wi th respcct thc Clerk of Courtof the Eastem llistrict ol'Arkansas the tleputy and clerks,Canttellcontends thcy altcrcddocketentriesin a pendingca$e has in that district he 5 : 0 5CV.157. Acoess thedocket to in sheet this case indicates case a civil rightscase the is cantrell v. Huclmhee, al., filcd bytheplaintiff onMay 23,2005. Thedockctcntries refers et he to asbeingaltcrcdaredocketentry#33 and# 66. Docketentry#33 is a document filed as a motionfor appointment counsel. Cantrelloonlends docurncnt of the was alteredbecause he elltitledthe document a motion for "orderto showcausc, a preliminaryinjunction,lor as for
-2-
Case 2:07-cv-02038-RTD
Document 6
Filed 04/26/2007
Page 3 of 4
appointmcnt ol'counsel, for classactioncerlification" it wasonly filed asa motionfor and but appointment ofcounscl.However, docket the sheet reflects a motiofl for orderto show also that causemotionfor preliminary , injunction. motionfor classcertification, motionto appoint and was c o u n s e l filedon April 19,2006, #36. as l )o c u me n t66 is entitledmotior for copies noticeofchangeofatldress.Thetlocket and sheereflectsit wasfiled asa noticeofchangeof adtlress. t T h i s court doesnot havejurisdictionto review the decisions madeby other federal districtcourts.Instead, ifCantrellbelieves clcrkofcourthas thc violated constitutional his rights by refusing file doouments submitted him, his reme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?