London et al v. Reece et al

Filing 85

ORDER denying 82 Motion for Order; and denying 83 Motion for Subpoena. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on April 1, 2010. (lw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION LLOYD LONDON v. CASE NO. 07-2087 PLAINTIFF

JIMMY DORNEY, Sheriff, Johnson County; RUTH ANN HOWELL, Administrator, Johnson County Jail; JERRY DORNEY, Chief Deputy, Johnson County ORDER

DEFENDANTS

Now before the Court is the Motion for Order (Doc. 82) and Motion for Subpoena (Doc. 83) filed by the Plaintiff. In these Motions, Plaintiff requests an order for interrogatory of Bette Jean Dunlapp, who Plaintiff alleges officiated the marriage of Plaintiff and Linda Goins Reece. Additionally, Plaintiff seeks to subpoena a family bible which Plaintiff alleges records the marriage of himself to Ms. Reece. The issues before the Court in the above-styled case are Plaintiff's claims he was denied access to the Court and denied access to the mail while he was incarcerated in Johnson County, Arkansas. The issue of Mr. London's purported marriage clearly is not at issue or of any relevance in this matter and the Motion for Order (Doc. 82) and Motion for Subpoena (Doc. 83) are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of April 2010.

/s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-1-