Williams v. Gordon et al
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Thomas H Williams, 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by C. O. Gordon, C. O. Sosbeeb, Mike Conger, Frank Atkinson. Objections to R&R due by 3/12/2010. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on February 23, 2010. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION THOMAS H. WILLIAMS, SR. v. CASE NO.: 07-2121 PLAINTIFF
C.O. GORDON; THOMAS TRAVIS; SHERIFF FRANK ATKINSON; MIKE CONGER; ADMINISTRATOR DEVEAN; C.O. SOSBEEB; JIM DOE, Head of Maintenance; and BILL DOE, #2 Maintenance
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The undersigned propounded a questionnaire to the Plaintiff on January 26, 2010, to assist the Court in reviewing the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendants. (Doc. 37). The questionnaire was due to the court on or before February 15, 2010. This date has passed, and the questionnaire has not been returned to the Court, nor has any mail been returned to the Court as undeliverable. Accordingly, it is the recommendation of the undersigned that the Complaint (Doc. 1) be DISMISSED for failure to follow a Court Order and for failure to prosecute. The parties have fourteen days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court. DATED this 23rd day of February 2010.
/s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?