Nelson v. Crawford County Detention Center
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Billy Joe Nelson. Objections to R&R due by 8/31/2009. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on August 13, 2009. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS F O R T SMITH DIVISION
B IL LY JOE NELSON v. DEPUTY WATERDOWN; D E P U T Y BURGOS; C O R P O R A L CUPP; C P T . MARVIN; D E P U T Y IRVIN; S H E R IF F ALLEN; D E P U T Y ALLISSON; D E P U T Y COLE; D E P U T Y HUFFMAN; C P L. MEHAFFY Civil No. 08- 2037
P L A IN T I F F
R E P O R T AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE O n June 26, 2009, the Court entered an Order granting Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 3 0 ) and allowing until and including July 31, 2009 for Plaintiff to file his Response to the Defendants' Motion fo r Summary Judgment. (Doc. 31). This date has passed, and the Court has received no response to the D e fe n d a n ts ' Motion for Summary Judgment, or other correspondence from the Plaintiff. No mail has been re tu rn e d to the Court. Additionally, the records of the Arkansas Department of Corrections show Plaintiff to b e housed at the address of record. A c c ord in g ly, it is the recommendation of the undersigned that the above styled case be dismissed w ith ou t prejudice for failure to prosecute, failure to obey an Order of the Court, and/or failure to comply with L oc a l Rule 5.5 (c) (2) for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas. P la in tiff has ten (10) days from receipt of this report and recommendation in which to file written o b je c tio n s pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of th e right to appeal questions of fact. Plaintiff is reminded that objections must be both timely and specific t o trigger de novo review by the district court. D a te d this 13th day of August, 2009. /s/ J. Marschewski HONORABLE JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?