Greene v. Beaumont et al
ORDER denying as moot 79 Motion to Compel; and denying as moot 80 Motion to Compel. Should the Plaintiff be dissatisfied with the Defendants responses he should file another motion to compel with the court stating the specific responses that are inadequate. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on August 19, 2009. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION MICHAEL DON GREEN V. KIMBERLY BEAUMONT and KEVIN BEAUMONT ORDER Before the court is the Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel as to Kevin Beaumont (Doc. 79) and Second Motion to Compel as to Kimberly Beaumont (Doc. 80) fled August 17, 2009. The Defendants have filed a Response (Doc. 82) on August 17, 2009 contending that they have responded to the discovery request by the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff's Motions are DENIED as MOOT at this time. Should the Plaintiff be dissatisfied with the Defendants responses he should file another Motion to Compel with the court stating the specific responses that are inadequate. NO. 2:08-CV-02048-RTD PLAINTIFF
IT IS SO ORDERED this August 19, 2009.
/s / HONORABLE JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?