Davis v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 9

JUDGMENT REVERSING AND REMANDING CASE TO COMMISSIONER for further consideration pursuant to sentence four and, ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on July 31, 2009. (rw)

Download PDF
IN 'II IL LJNI'I'UD S'I'NTES I-]ISTRI{:T {]()U1{ I' WESTh]RN DISTRICT AITK.ANSNS OIi' I ' O I {I' SMI'I'H I]IVISION M l C l l A l - i l - E. DAVIS P L . A I N IIIIT I c l v t t . No. 0ft-10.51 M l C l IAIL..1, S'lRtIE,Courmrssroncr n Soc,iul Security AdnrinistrirLion D F F I . - N l l , . \I N p Jr-r GME_hLT N o wontlris # h 1 "ci * t ayol _ {.4fu,a_l(X)9- conrcs {ol corrsiderarion Rcport on thc antl I l R c c t t n t t nndittittn e daled.Tuly 2{){)9, LheHunolable 13, bv Jarries Marschowski, R. l.lnitcdStates Magistlate Judgefor thc Wcstcrnl)istrjcto1'Arkansas. lcn (l0) dayshavepasserl wilhout ohjecliotrs being filcr1hv thc prrrtics. The L-ourthas rcvicwccltLriscase,and being well and srrflicient.ly ativised, findsthatthc R(rrpr)rl Reconrnrerrdatitrn and is propcrirndslrorrkl adopletl hc i r titscnlile'ty. Acc,ordingly. (lourthqrrchv thc adopts Rcporl the autlltrcorrr rnrrrdation; rcvLrr$es t h e decisionof thc (lonrnrissioner: and rcrlanclstlris ciue lo the (lornrnissionrrfbr furthcr g pursuirnt sentence considcration to four of42 t t S.{1. a05(g). l l plainlill wishesto I cr'1.lcsl awilrdrrl'ii(lorney an lles and cost undcrthc l,iqual Ac:r.c-ss t o Justicc (FlA,lA) I.J.S.C, 2412,an application Act 28 may he liled up unlil 30 daysattcrthc SS "not appcalahh"i.tr., jrLdgrnenl becomes JQdxl r 011"r'the 60-daytirnc tbr appcalhirscndecl. ,\"cc S h u k t h v. SL:hdElir. 509 LI.S, 292, 296, I l3 S.Cll. ?6?,5 (1991)1 28 t .S,C. $.h 2 4? ( d ) ) ( B ) , ( d ) ( 2 x ( i ) 1 r( I ' I ' I SSOORI]E,TTTD. wesitf^rDipffifr%ontufiiIs^sI t{lcl-.ilIDGE L t N l l ' : D tn F.s S t)ts I I O N : R ( ) I } I . .1 - ' I D A W S O N R. JUL | 200e 3 cltffts Jtrl sff{,cl.Efir( R. AO72A (Rv.8i82) ItERlTy ctfRl(

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?